
I was watching The Brighton Strangler again the other day. (Once or twice a year I get the urge to re-acquaint myself with this peculiar little semi-classic; you know how it is, I'm sure.)
As always, I was struck by the fact that I knew virtually nothing about its beautiful, somewhat feline British star June Duprez, and by the fact that her career, which had seemed so promising, appeared to abruptly come to an end just as she was reaching her peak.
Did she die young, marry and retire, or what?
This time, I decided to find out...
.
Born in 1918 (during an air raid), she was the daughter of Fred Duprez, an American vaudevillian who had made his professional home in Britain during the 1930's. (He played Groucho's role in the British stage run of The Cocoanuts and is very funny as the studio mogul in the Crazy Gang's Okay For Sound [1937]. The following year he accompanied Will Hay to America for his oddball co-production Hey! Hey! USA [1938], and suffered a fatal heart attack, at the age of fifty-four, on the ship coming back home.).
June got her big break from Alexander Korda, who gave her four big roles between 1939 and 1940: The Four Feathers, The Spy In Black, The Lion Has Wings and The Thief of Bagdad. The latter production was moved to Hollywood after the outbreak of war, and gave June, who is photographed beautifully throughout in Technicolor, her first taste of the film capital. The film was a huge success and June opted to stay in America and give Hollywood a try.
.
Why did her career not take off as expected? Not for want of anything in her performances or screen presence. Incredibly, her agent made the elementary mistake of setting her per-picture salary far too high for a largely untested actress, with the result that she received a fraction of the work she merited, and never made the impact on audiences that she she should have. And with that one simple, infuriating error of judgement an entire career was stalled.According to this excellent Powell & Pressburger site "at one point she was so impoverished she nibbled on dog biscuits, which she covered with marmalade."
.
"Whenever you see a Sherlock Holmes movie, say a prayer for Dr. Watson," June has been quoted as saying. "Because if it hadn't been for the kindness of Nigel Bruce and his wife, I just don't know what I'd have done in Hollywood. They kept me circulating socially when I was stagnating professionally. And the times they gave me dinner!
"But the very worst part was the men out there. I spent few minutes at a Barbara Hutton party talking with David O. Selznick. Later that same night he appeared at my door, and when I wouldn't let him in, he broke my window.
"Another time, on a warm day, I had my apartment door opened and in walked Harry Cohn - right into my house. I'd never met him. I didn't know who he was, even when he told me. When I told my agent that I nearly had him arrested, he told me that such a thing would have ruined me. Me! I had been assured that I was the prime contender for the lead in Sundown, the part that was to be the making of Gene Tierney, but after that horrible scene with Selznick, it was never again mentioned... Do you wonder why it's called a jungle?"
.
She is worth looking out for in three Hollywood movies, however. Cary Grant and director Clifford Odets overrode studio objections to cast her in None But the Lonely Heart (1944); she considered the result her best movie appearance. She's also splendid as the female lead in Rene Clair's And Then There Were None (1945), one of the best and most under-rated Hollywood films of the forties, and by a million miles the best ever film of an Agatha Christie novel.
And then, of course, there is The Brighton Strangler (1945), a decidedly minor but still bafflingly little-known melodrama with a lovely Christmastime setting and a strange and rather splendid set-up: an actor who has been playing 'the Brighton Strangler' on the London stage is conked on the head when the theatre is hit during an air raid, loses his memory and comes to believe that he is the real strangler. So he travels to Brighton and begins murdering totally innocent strangers unfortunate enough to serve as surrogates for the characters in the play.Because the murders are really not his fault the film has a somewhat black comic edge, never more pronounced than when he attempts to explain his motives to the people he is about to kill and they, naturally enough, don't have a clue what he's talking about.
June, in military uniform a lot of the time, is relaxed and charming, as is John Loder as the strangler, another jobbing Brit in Hollywood who turned up just about everywhere but never quite made it.
.
June later moved to New York, where she appeared on Broadway, then to Rome for a time, before finally returning to London, where she died in her sleep on August 17, 1984..
16 comments:
I loved her in the four feathers.
Interesting how she was looked over and then passed over for those certain roles.
Hi, MissMatilda!
I must come clean and admit that I haven't actually seen it. I love the Thief of Bagdad, obviously, but Four Feathers I've never caught up with.
Thanks for looking in!
Thanks for the lovely photos and trivia. June Duprez was one of the most beautiful women on film - back when unique beauty was celebrated on celluloid. (These days I have a hard time remembering faces of the modern stars.) Too bad her career stalled. The Powell and Pressburger Yahoo discussion group is highly recommended to fans of P&P films - I've been a member for years.
I really love to read about the stars-that-could-have-been. What an asshole D. O. Selznick seems to have been! A little too used to getting what he wanted, I guess.
Great, great, great post! And I have to look up The Brighton Strangler!
Panavia999 -
She was a honey all right; a little like Simone Simon - she could certainly have played her role in Cat People. Have you seen And Then There Were None? What a cast!
Lolita -
Yes, you especially, I think, would get a kick out of Brighton Strangler: it's a bit like those Laird Cregar films, only set in the forties.
As for Selznick, well I suppose I can see his... no, no, no! What am I saying? You're absolutely right. Terrible behaviour.
[WARNING: 'TEN LITTLE INDIANS'/'AND THEN THERE WERE NONE' FILM AND BOOK SPOLIERS AHEAD!]
Quite agree with you, Matthew, about 'And Then There Were None'. The first time you see it you are completely gripped by the whodunnit side of things; the second time, you watch for the clues (which are there) but you still wonder at the fiendish mechanics of Agatha Christie's mind; the third time you realize what a wonderfully funny film it is, as well as creepy - 'The Old Dark House' of the 40s, perhaps?
However (and here is where I intend to pick your massive movie brain, Matthew), seeing it again recently, I was shocked to see the denouement rather differently from what I had always remembered. It goes like this...
When there are only (apparently) two little indians left - Vera (played by June Duprez) and Lombard (an excellent Louis Hayward - what happened to him?), and they have their scene on the beach, I always remembered it as Vera pulls the gun on Lombard, then we get the long shot where Vera seemingly shoots Lombard who falls to the ground - leaving us thinking that if she is the only one left, she must be the killer; then, when she gets back up to the house, and we see the judge sitting there, and he spills the beans, we get that shock; then we (and the judge) get a further shock, when Lombard re-appears - thus revealing that Vera only pretended to shoot him, because between them, on the beach, they had figured out it was the judge whodunnit.
But, as I say, I was shocked myself, on my recent viewing to see and hear what looked to me like an extra scene on the beach, where Lombard explicitly tells Vera to pretend to shoot him. Fair enough, in that way the viewer still gets the shock of seeing crafty little Barry Fitzgerald twinkling away at Vera when she gets back to the house, but surely Monsieur Clair missed a trick by not having us believe, briefly, that Lombard was dead, and allowing us the frisson of surprise and relief when he reappears? (Not that I'm in any position to tell a great director what to do.)
Anyway, it's not whether Rene Clair missed a trick - I simply could have sworn that's how I had always seen it before. So, Matthew, over to you. Was the film ever shown like that, and we've had two slightly different versions over the years? Is my memory playing me tricks? Am I remembering something done in one of the other (lesser) film versions of the story (not likely, as I don't think I've ever sat through any of them). I'm pretty certain I'm not remembering anything from the book (which I've read two or three times - though not recently), because there, of course, everyone dies!
Or is it just a case of rose-tinted spectacles, because, even if never done that way, it would have been better - the only flaw in a wonderful movie.
Interesting...
I'm pretty sure there's only the one version of Clair's film, though there are two prints circulating. (Most are amalgams of the poor quality title sequence from the US release and the main body of the GB release, which was of course titled Ten Little Niggers, as was the book.)
It is possible, perhaps, that the US version had a slightly different ending, though I can't imagine why.
There is a shot exactly as you recall -a long shot showing Lombard falling - in the best of the other versions: the 1966 Ten Little Indians. However, I can't remember if there was no talk at all to tip off the viewer beforehand. Plus the shot followed an idiotic 'whodunnit break' which you would surely remember if this is indeed what you are confusing it with. (Plus the film is set in a Swiss mountain resort, not a Devon island!)
My guess is that it's the old memory playing tricks on you. (Incidentally, it is often said that Clair's film copped out by abandoning Christie's 'they all die' ending - but the truth is that the film is an adaptation not of the book but of 'And Then There Were None', Christie's own theatrical adaptation, in which she herself created the softened ending. I have to say I prefer it in the movie, though the grimmer resolution is absolutely right for the book.)
Nice writeup. Poor girl. Agents can be so stupid...the amounts of careers they have destroyed...
You've been tagged!
http://byjingobygee.blogspot.com/2009/08/two-sisters-tag.html
Hey, Matthew! I adjusted a bit of the HTML on the guest blogging post and I think it's working now. (I hope!)
Matthew: Say it's not so! June Duprez eating dog biscuits with marmalade! I can't stand the thought!
Loved this post for all my usual reasons for loving your posts: Great, fascinating history bits about moviedom. You know, I can easily see Selsnick breaking the window because he got thwarted. He was such a spoiled baby - so used to getting everything his way - and such a pig into the bargain. Clearly Tierney knew the better career move was to let him in the front door.
Harry Cohn walking right into an apartment? That's so perfect. He would wonder why you weren't fetching him a drink to boot.
Great, great stuff here, Matthew!
I have only seen this actress in Four Feathers, which I love. She was spectacular in it, lending the film a kind of exotic touch. Thanks for doing here what you do best: Exploring the lesser known (at least to me) corners of the world of film. -- Mykal
Or if not a drink she could at least have offered him some dog biscuits and marmalade...
I'll wager that you, too, would greatly enjoy And Then There Were None and The Brighton Strangler.
Thanks for stopping by, Mykal!
Matthew! I see you are back from holiday! I trust you had a wonderful break. Welcome back to the blogosphere! Missed your input and posts. -- Mykal
Yep, back and headed your way!
June Duprez was a lovely actress, and she starred in two of the greatest films of all time, "The Four Feathers" (1939) and "Thief of Bagdad" (1940).
You'll get no argument from me.
Post a Comment